After the release that the CBS report, I find it more puzzling that the Columbia Journalism Review chose to do the piece they just published.

We’re talking about a journalist with one of the most respected jobs in the country airing an incredibly dubious story about the President of the United States nearly a month before an election. Certainly this is one of the biggest journalism stories in at least a decade. How does our industry’s most-respected journal cover the scandal? With a report on how the people who exposed the story (bloggers) got some facts wrong too. Even if the latter is true (that’s questionable), seems like they missed the much larger fish.